Difference: PPTMeetingTCR (r3 vs. r2)

-- TomasCap - 25 Aug 2017 Here I'll put the presentation for MSU Meeting

Start presentation

Slide 1: Look for the best variable using MC

  • An analysis was done in order to seen which variables are the best when all variable in the HAWC data stream were used.

Ranking Using MC

Slide 2: Choose the best variable

  • The first plot show the variables that have at least one ranking point with a value less or equal to 2. The second is the same but it has a value less or equal to 4.

Variable that have at least one ranking point with a value less 3 Variable that have at least one ranking point with a value less 5

Slide 3: New Network Training using Real Data

Three networks were trained using Real Data:

  • Using 15 inputs:
  • Using 4 inputs:
    • Compactness
    • rec.PINC
    • rec.LDFAmp
    • rec.LDFChi2
  • Using 6 inputs:
    • Compactness
    • rec.PINC
    • rec.LDFAmp
    • rec.LDFChi2
    • rec.SFCFChi2
    • rec.gammaleLLH

Slide 4: Conditions

  • Real data were used to training and verification.
    • /data/scratch/userspace/pretz/scrappy-platypus-optimization/
  • Both stages were applied the following cuts:
    • rec.coreFideScale < 100 [Events are inside of the HAWC ].
    • rec.CxPE40 > 0.
  • Crab maps were made using the month: January and February 2017
    • /data/archive/hawcroot/data/hawc/reconstructed/hawcprod/v2.02.02/config-38125/reco_xcdf/

Slide 5: Real data vs MC

In the training stage, I should apply a cut in Energy

Comparative of the NN training with 15 inputs when MC and Real data were used Comparative of the NN training with 15 inputs when MC and Real data were used -- NN/SC

Slide 6: Look the maps in Bin 0

Significance maps of Crab nebula using the Networks trained

Slide 7: Weekly goals Ranking using real data

  • I don't know why rec.nTankAvail have a good ranking. Maybe it has different value in both files (MC as signal and Real data as Bkg)

Variable that have at least one ranking point with a value less 3 using real data

Slide 8: Weekly goals

  • Work on the version 2 of disMax
  • Read information about BDT
  • Train a BDT with 15 inputs
  • Research why don't have a better result when I use real data (Maybe I have a better result if I apply one cut in Energy)
IAttachmentActionSizeDateWhoComment
15MCAndRDCom.pngpng15MCAndRDCom.pngmanage 56.5 K 28 Aug 2017 - 17:20TomasCap Comparative of the NN training with 15 inputs when MC and Real data were used -- NN/SC
15MCAndRDCom_MaxSig.pngpng15MCAndRDCom_MaxSig.pngmanage 57.1 K 28 Aug 2017 - 17:21TomasCap Comparative of the NN training with 15 inputs when MC and Real data were used
SignificanceMapsComparation.pngpngSignificanceMapsComparation.pngmanage 1327.2 K 28 Aug 2017 - 17:22TomasCap Significance maps of Crab nebula using the Networks trained
allvariable.pngpngallvariable.pngmanage 147.9 K 28 Aug 2017 - 16:36TomasCapRankingUsingMC
thebest2.pngpngthebest2.pngmanage 44.2 K 28 Aug 2017 - 16:40TomasCap Variable that have at least one ranking point with a value less 3
thebest4.png thebest2RD.png png thebest4.png thebest2RD.png manage55.0 65.8 K 28 Aug 2017 - 16:42 18:32 TomasCap Variable that have at least one ranking point with a value less 5 3 using Real data
thebest4.pngpngthebest4.pngmanage 55.0 K 28 Aug 2017 - 16:42TomasCap Variable that have at least one ranking point with a value less 5

View topic | View difference side by side | History: r3 < r2 < r1 | More topic actions
 
This site is powered by FoswikiCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Foswiki? Send feedback