Difference: BenTamagne (1 vs. 5)

Revision 5
17 Oct 2016 - Main.BenTamagne
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebTopicList"
-- BenTamagne - 22 Apr 2016
Changed:
<
<
August 19th, 2016
>
>
October 17th, 2016

This is an update on my latest 2D hadron rejection optimization results. Compactness__PINCness_1000x1000_bins.pdf

This update is specifically for 1000x1000 bin resolution, which is finer than the previous 100x100 bin resolution results found in HAWC_Update_8_19_16.pdf.

August 19th, 2016
  August 11th, 2016
Line: 41 to 47
 

META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="MID-SURE_Poster.pdf" attr="" comment="Ben's 2016 Mid-SURE poster on GH Separation" date="1470935617" name="MID-SURE_Poster.pdf" path="MID-SURE Poster.pdf" size="1948910" user="BenTamagne" version="1"
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="HAWC_Update_8_19_16.pdf" attr="" comment="Updates on Ben's 2D hadron rejection optimizer" date="1471632536" name="HAWC_Update_8_19_16.pdf" path="HAWC Update 8_19_16.pdf" size="2602009" user="BenTamagne" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="Compactness__PINCness_1000x1000_bins.pdf" attr="" comment="" date="1476736264" name="Compactness__PINCness_1000x1000_bins.pdf" path="Compactness & PINCness 1000x1000 bins.pdf" size="236912" user="BenTamagne" version="1"
Revision 4
19 Aug 2016 - Main.BenTamagne
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebTopicList"
-- BenTamagne - 22 Apr 2016
Added:
>
>
August 19th, 2016
  August 11th, 2016

I've uploaded the poster I presented at the Mid-SURE event held at MSU late last month. The presentation seem to go well and I learned a few things to help improve for future presentations.
Line: 38 to 40
  Moving forward is now met with new confidence in confirming that my program does not fundamentally differ from John's established results.

META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="MID-SURE_Poster.pdf" attr="" comment="Ben's 2016 Mid-SURE poster on GH Separation" date="1470935617" name="MID-SURE_Poster.pdf" path="MID-SURE Poster.pdf" size="1948910" user="BenTamagne" version="1"
Added:
>
>
META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="HAWC_Update_8_19_16.pdf" attr="" comment="Updates on Ben's 2D hadron rejection optimizer" date="1471632536" name="HAWC_Update_8_19_16.pdf" path="HAWC Update 8_19_16.pdf" size="2602009" user="BenTamagne" version="1"
Revision 3
11 Aug 2016 - Main.BenTamagne
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebTopicList"
-- BenTamagne - 22 Apr 2016
Added:
>
>
August 11th, 2016

I've uploaded the poster I presented at the Mid-SURE event held at MSU late last month. The presentation seem to go well and I learned a few things to help improve for future presentations.
  July 7th, 2016

I was able to replicate John Pretz's results his GH separation code located here:
Line: 32 to 36
  I will confer with John as to which cut files correspond to which efficiency plots given in various talks.

Moving forward is now met with new confidence in confirming that my program does not fundamentally differ from John's established results.
Added:
>
>

META FILEATTACHMENT attachment="MID-SURE_Poster.pdf" attr="" comment="Ben's 2016 Mid-SURE poster on GH Separation" date="1470935617" name="MID-SURE_Poster.pdf" path="MID-SURE Poster.pdf" size="1948910" user="BenTamagne" version="1"
Revision 2
13 Jul 2016 - Main.BenTamagne
Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="WebTopicList"
-- BenTamagne - 22 Apr 2016
Added:
>
>

July 7th, 2016

I was able to replicate John Pretz's results his GH separation code located here:

http://private.hawc-observatory.org/svn/hawc/papers/crab-1yr-performance/plot-making/analysis-start-to-finish/code/expectation.cxx

using the cuts specified here:

http://private.hawc-observatory.org/svn/hawc/papers/crab-1yr-performance/plot-making/cuts/

by using my own version of the code, located here:

http://private.hawc-observatory.org/svn/hawc/sandbox/bentamagne/GHSep/

in the script crossCheck.cc, in which the cuts mentioned above are currently hard-coded in, but I can make revisions if this becomes an issue.

The input file I used is located on the UMD cluster here:

$HAWCROOT/sim/reco/aerie_svn_27754/systematics/best_mc/test_nobroadpulse_10pctlogchargesmearing_0.63qe_25kHzNoise_run4434/sweets/2.63_3.45e-11_1000000_20_1.0/succeeded/2.63_3.45e-11_1000000_20_1.0_combined_rec.root

I have confirmed I am able to reproduce his result of "particles from the crab per day" using the cuts ../cuts/cuts-noghsep-onoffdet-bigbin.txt and ../cuts/cuts-ghsep-onoffdet-bigbin.txt, which directly influence the efficiencies and Q values for each of the fHit bins.

There were two key differences between my own and John's analysis that allowed for this:
    • The cuts files above that John directed me to had an angular binning cut of 4 degrees, supposedly for the purposes of systematics. Whereas my angular binning is dependent on fHit bin.
    • In contrast to my previous versions of my code, John's version used a log parabola energy spectrum for the Crab, whereas I was using the -2.63 power law.

I will confer with John as to which cut files correspond to which efficiency plots given in various talks.

Moving forward is now met with new confidence in confirming that my program does not fundamentally differ from John's established results.
 
This site is powered by FoswikiCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Foswiki? Send feedback